|Two middle-class members of yet another Trotskyist group attempting to lead and/or control Muslims; which is what they used to do with the UK working class.|
The SWP/UAF is a Trotskyist revolutionary group that used to severely patronise the English working class. It wanted to lead and/or change them – much as the super-posh Fabians did in the 1910s,1920s and 1930s.
Now the SWP/UAF patronises Muslims. It feeds off Muslim ‘radicalism’ at the same time as wanting to turn Muslims into Marxists. .. Can you believe that?!
The SWP/UAF defends literally everything Muslims do because they think that will help ‘radicalise' society or even bring about their very own white, middle-class revolution.
The SWP also created United Against Fascism (UAF) - which itself is attempting to bring about sharia blasphemy law in the UK. It is doing so in its sick and sad attempt to radicalise or revolutionise society in its own Trotskyist direction.
|Big fans of killers - as long as they have brown skin.|
Many SWP leaders have gone over to a group called COUNTERFIRE. There are indeed differences between the two Trotskyist groups but none of them matter to anyone on the outside. Basically, COUNTERFIRE has more or less stopped patronising the working class. The working-class had let these middle-class professionals down. It never gave them the revolution they fantasised about. Counterfire (New SWP) now believes in latching on to any social movement (or even non-Western states) which is at odds with 'the capitalist state'. Thus they even support Iran, as well as various misogynists, killers, homophobes, rapists, terrorists, etc. As long as long as these nice people have brown skin and are “oppressed” – they will support them.
This means that COUNTERFIRE, as well as the SWP/UAF, are supreme opportunists who will work with any group of people if that group "fights the state" (in their own view, of course) - but especially if these killers, rapists, paedophiles, misogynists, etc. have brown skin.
Such is the sick reality of this massive Trotskyist inversion of the “West’s and white people’s racism”. An inversion which nonetheless remains racism.
When such leftists say that “blacks can’t be racist”; they are being racist. Racist towards both whites and blacks. Towards blacks because they are denying them agency and free will – the agency and free will to be racist.
When leftists believe that Muslims are allowed to terrorise, kill and be misogynists, whereas whites and Westerners can’t, they are being racist.
When leftists treat Palestinians or Muslims as children who can’t control their own violence and hate, they are being racist.
In fact they are simply inverting the racism of their own “colonialist” ancestors in the 19th century. But instead of being irredeemably negative towards other cultures and races, they are being irredeemably positive towards them. Either way, it’s still racism.